Why not make the FT/JT messages a bit longer to accommodate the compound calls?

If a longer tx/rx cycle time would be needed for FT8 - up to 30s would be fine 
by me. It would be nice to have enough time to manually initiate a decodable CQ 
answer.  

If a longer cycle time or message improved decode performance, that too would 
be nice. I do not remember yet having a FT8 decode below about -20, but 
regularly had  JT65’s below -25.



Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to