CAT...  because that's kinda the point with most digital modes these days.  
And it's an FT-847, not 840.

________________________________
From: Alan VK2ZIW <bea...@unixservice.com.au>
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 6:41 PM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Yaesu FT-847

Hi all,

Why do you need CAT control at all?

What's really needed is a rig with Stability.

Any rig with a digital VFO will do.

My 2c.

Yes, I have an FT-840 and it's OK.

Alan VK2ZIW


On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:54:42 -0400, Karl Heinz Kremer wrote
> FT-840UNI would be OK. “Early” or “NoGet” would require the user to know more 
> about what’s going on with these devices.

>
>
Karl Heinz - K5KHK
>


>

> On Oct 8, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Black Michael 
> <mdblac...@yahoo.com<mailto:mdblac...@yahoo.com>> wrote:

>
> What can we call these earlier rigs to make the apparent in the riglist?
>

> FT-840EARLY  ???
> Or
> FT-840UNI (unidirectional)
> FT-840NOGET

>

> Or any better idea?
>

> de Mike W9MDB

>

>
>

>

>

>
> On Monday, October 8, 2018, 9:47:05 AM CDT, Karl Heinz Kremer 
> <k...@khk.net<mailto:k...@khk.net>> wrote:
>

>

>
> This also seems to be the case with my early Yaesu FT-840 - it can receive 
> CAT commands, but does not report anything back.

>
>

> Karl Heinz - K5KHK
>



>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:44 AM Black Michael via wsjt-devel 
> <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> 
> wrote:

>
> What version of WSJT-X are you using right now?
>

> Looks like we need a new rig entry for the earlier serial #'s and I can build 
> you one for testing.
>

> de Mike W9MDB

>

>
>

>

>

>
> On Monday, October 8, 2018, 9:34:22 AM CDT, Shane Stroud 
> <shanestroud1...@hotmail.com<mailto:shanestroud1...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>

>

>
> I have discovered that the early serial numbered models of the Yaesu FT-847 
> had unidirectional CAT.  Basically, the software can send frequencies and 
> modes to the rig, but the rig cannot respond.  This applies to serial numbers 
> through about 8GXXXX. Mine is an 8EXXXX series.
>

> In any version of WSJT, under any operating system, the rig will set 
> frequency and mode, then error out because it cannot respond to polling.
>

> I'm not sure if this needs fixed in WSJT or in hamlib, but other hamlib 
> programs seem to work with the rig without issue.  
> _______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel




Alan

Evil flourishes when good men do nothing.
Consider the Christmas child.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Beard               Unix Support Technician from 1984 to today
70 Wedmore Rd.           Sun Solaris, AIX, HP/UX, Linux, SCO, MIPS
Emu Heights N.S.W. 2750  Routers, terminal servers, printers, terminals etc..
+61 2 47353013 (h)       Support Programming, shell scripting, "C", assembler
0414 353013 (mobile)     After uni, electronics tech
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to