Folks,

I agree wholeheartedly that the facility is there already for respected 
contributors to feed back comments that are handled well by the development 
team within the JT software development ranks.

The issue will be the “wombats” (as we term them here in Australia) that 
suddenly see more signals that they cannot decode – the “wombats” that are not 
up to date or have had systems set up by other Amateurs.

Yes I can foresee a period of chaos as I see that many are also expressing 
concerns about.

We are ALL on these forums going to have to be VERY TOLERANT with regards to 
posts on these forums too ... There is going to be a lot of repetition (and 
there is already). Tolerance. Think abot what and how you respond, if you 
respond. No “you are a wombat” postings ... These are not good for progressing 
AR...

The Github and Sourceforge processes are more than adequate for regular 
contributors and direct communication/attention of the Development team. Yet 
there are the vast majority that do not contribute or are not on these lists.

It is now time for ALL of us here to openly start talking with others about 
changes and promoting change and upgrades. This means adjustments to our web 
pages / QRZ.COM etc. Pages, talks at our clubs, comments on radio nets that we 
participate in. It also requires any of us that have ever assisted other 
Amateurs with the JT software to have “how are you going” discussions with 
other Amateurs and advising them that a significant change is on the way.

Many Amateurs have environs that just work and will be resistant to change. 
This is the hardest type of Amateur to convince that change is necessary.

HAM – Help All Mankind. Amateur Radio being for People and about People in a 
technical, regulated environment. People. We need to work heavily and promote - 
leaving these priority channels here clean for serious issues that will arise. 
Note that we have not seen the so-called Windows 1809 (and its successor) 
rolled out en-masse yet !

Egad !

73

Steve I
VK3VM / VK3SIR



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

________________________________
From: Brian Moran <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 5:37:44 AM
To: WSJT software development
Subject: [wsjt-devel] State of the Art Weak Signal Modes vs. State of the Art 
Issue Tracking

WSJT-X represents current state of the art for weak signals in Amateur Radio 
communications, but using 'email as a bug database' to keep track of issues 
decidedly does NOT represent the state of the art in anything. Asking everyone 
to read all of the emails to see if their issue is represented before sending 
their own email has repeatedly been shown to not work.

There are plenty of 
tools<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue-tracking_systems> (e.g. 
JIRA, Github Issues<https://guides.github.com/features/issues/>, even the one 
built into Sourceforge<https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Tickets/>) 
that can keep track of a project's list of known issues, priorities, progress 
towards fixing, etc. and I'd expect the WSJT-X developers must already use 
something like that. Why that facility is not exposed for at least read access 
by the hoi polloi is known only to them.

If everyone were able to see the list of issues, then it would even be a matter 
of just replying to the Nth "hey, I get an SSL library issue on startup" 
message with the URL of the issue. It might even expand the population of 
people able to contribute to the project in a positive 
way<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=690b0543a813b0ecfc51b0374c0ce6c8275435f0>.
 It might help offload this type of 'support' task from the developers. Some 
issue trackers even prompt the bug reporter to look through the open and 
resolved issues before filing their issue.  The popular tools might require 
logging into a tool's website, but I would expect that anyone that can 
configure WSJT-X for Fox-Hound operation on a non-standard frequency should 
also be able to figure out how to file an issue in a bug tracker.

I truly believe that using modern, purpose-built tools for issue tracking tasks 
would benefit everyone. Are there reasons why we are not doing so?

Brian N9ADG






_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to