Thank you for your comments, Bill. I can only relate my own experiences. I have 
had to fiddle with every version of Windows up to 7 to keep the time sync 
accurate enough for my liking, even before JT/JT modes came into my shack. I do 
not run Windows server versions at home, not do I run any version of Windows 10 
at home. I have been using Windows 10 on two computers at work by corporate IT 
dictates since earlier this year an I can honestly say that I don't hate it any 
less than when I first tried it out, but I have no need for precise timekeeping 
there.

OTOH, every version of Linux I have run for at least the last 18+ years has had 
NTP installed via a distro package manger with little or no configuration and 
has always kept the clocks spot on for all practical purposes (including FT8). 
Once I confirm that ntpd is running I literally never have to worry about the 
clock. It just works and once it has the local clock disciplined it doesn't 
need to poll the servers very often.

73

-Jim
NU0C



On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:32:06 +0000
Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/2018 03:52, Jim Shorney wrote:
> > NTP is a mature protocol and has been doing it right for years. Windows is 
> > late to the party.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > -Jim
> > NU0C  
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> that's not really correct. Windows Server variants have had an NTP 
> client for many years, it is that client that is being shipped with the 
> latest Win10 builds as far as I know. I suspect that the reluctance of 
> MS to provide high accuracy clock setting on desktop Windows variants is 
> because they would also have to provide a robust and Worldwide network 
> of time servers like Apple do for the masOS community. Operating systems 
> like some Linux distributions have such networks which rely on the 
> commercial paid for variants to fund such services (Red Hat Enterprise 
> Linux and SuSE Enterprise Linux for example). Also individual home users 
> can select local NTP servers from public network like the pooled servers 
> offered under the *.pool.ntp.org domain name but these servers are not 
> really available for free commercial use so if MS were to ship a high 
> accuracy NTP client with Windows and advised users to use an ntp.org 
> service for time setting then the ntp.org operators would soon take 
> steps to stop such freeloading from a commercial entity like MS. Time 
> servers are not cost free, they need hardware and bandwidth and 
> ultimately atomic clocks which are definitely not cheap.
> 
> Anyway, reading the link Dana kindly posted, it is hardly a simple 
> facility. You must edit several registry values just to get it working 
> and it seems very unpolished for a desktop offering. If MS are 
> automatically disabling 3rd party NTP time clients in favour of that 
> then shame on them. They need to make it far more user friendly. I 
> wonder if they are still trying to discourage the higher NTP network 
> traffic that would be generated if it were as easy as clicking a tick 
> box in the settings.
> 
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.



--

"Good men don’t need rules. Today is not the day to find out why I have so 
many."  - Doctor Who


_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to