Hi Dave, the specific actual situation I have encountered involves using
WSJT-X for WSPR (not FT8).

Your thoughts?

David / K7DB

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019, 2:50 PM David Gilbert <xda...@cis-broadband.com>
wrote:

>
> As best I know, you don't need to ID every contact, and I suspect you
> wouldn't even if moving around within a bandwidth as narrow as is typical
> for FT8.  So why not simply use the freeform 13-character TX5 message to
> periodically ID?  I've played around with it a bit and it will even accept
> a few non-alphanumeric symbols like -, ?, and +.  It certainly will accept
> four character suffixes ... even four characters after a "/".  It shouldn't
> even matter whether any other amateur station realizes that it was you who
> sent it.
>
> I've seen several FT8 stations with long callsigns using TX5 to
> periodically identify their grid when it won't fit within the normal
> message exchange.
>
> What don't I understand?
>
> 73,
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
> On 10/20/2019 12:48 PM, David A. Behar wrote:
>
> Hi friends, I am writing to share an idea...
>
> WSJT callsign encoding generally accommodates most amateur radio
> callsigns, but some callsigns -- e.g., some special-event callsigns, and
> callsigns which might use a *four character suffix* as provided at ITU
> RR19-7 ยง30 <http://life.itu.int/radioclub/rr/art19.pdf#page=7> -- can't
> be accommodated by the coding scheme. There has been plenty of previous
> discussion about that, and I think no more is necessary.
>
> WSPR-X provides for the user's specification of a single callsign; that
> callsign is used for encoding into messages, and also for use in optional
> CW Morse identification.
>
> I think it would be nice if a user could optionally specify a free-form CW
> identification callsign which is not subject to the restrictions of the
> callsign encoding scheme. This would enable stations to comply with
> regulatory station identification requirements in cases of callsigns which
> are not accommodated by the callsign coding scheme.
>
> David / K7DB
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to