On 01/28/2011 02:44 PM, Heinz-M. Graesing wrote: > Hi John, > > Am 28.01.2011 17:55, schrieb John A. Sullivan III: > >> Even if we ultimately standardize on vcxsrv, I suggest we still keep the >> option to not install it in the installer and the option to use Other in >> the client for those who already have a commercial (or future FOSS) >> Windows X Server. At least, that's how we thought it through. Thanks - >> John >> > I would suggest not to make this part of the installer. Of cause it > should be part of the client configuration. The problem I see by > modifying the installer is that some companies have already made the > client installer part of their software deployment solution (a lot of > people asked for a "silent install option"). > As the installer is addressed to normal users, this might be a bit > confusing. > > Regards, > > Heinz >
Could the selection of Xserver be left to the packager? So a company could create their own .deb file and make it depend on a certain Xserver package as they needed. And then in the client they could either force a certain Xserver or just tell users how to configure for the Xserver that they use or just let them use whatever they like for an Xserver. Regards, Gerry _______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
