Hi Alex,I agree with you. So what about keeping on providing Xming "silently" , which has some drawbacks, but seems to work ok, and add an option, to add an Xserver of your choice, which makes everyone happy who is not happy with Xming. Once the problems with VcXsrv are solved/fixed you can change over. I have now I dear how much trouble it is to package both of them. Thanks to hard-disc pricing and broadband Internet I don't think size is an issue here. :)
Cheers Morty Am 28.01.2011 14:17, schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
I think so too. But we should provide a working Xserver with windows installer. Most of windows users don't want to install additional software, they prefer, that they clicking on installer.exe and after that have working application. Early, we had included Xming installer in x2goclient installer with option not to install it. X2goclient was free configurable which Xserver it should use. And we got a lot of complains that installer is much to complex. In any case, windows user must have a working client after execution of installer is finished.
-- Dipl.-Ing. Moritz 'Morty' Struebe (Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter) Lehrstuhl für Informatik 4 (Verteilte Systeme und Betriebssysteme) Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Martensstr. 1 91058 Erlangen Tel : +49 9131 85-25419 Fax : +49 9131 85-28732 eMail : stru...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de WWW : http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~morty
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
