Answers to Scott's easy ones:
---- you [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ----
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -- I'd like to see a decent vote/comment period go by, and then unless
> > anyone complains, a backup of the full Xalan-J 1.x CVS repository (not
> just
> > the files, but the whole repository) made, and then (with aid of a CVS
> > expert) actual filesystem removal of all files relating to Xalan-J 1.x
> > (i.e. not just CVS putting them in the attic, but actually deleting the
> > repository files).
>
> Why?
Why backup? Cause I'm paranoid. I'd like to keep the full history of the
1.x project, not just the last build. Maybe it's just me; if no-one else
cares, then just ensure the last few distros are backed up. -sc
Why whack the 1.x at the filesystem level instead of Attic'ing in the
repository? To reduce confusion and speed up checkout time - I thought Sam
was suggesting this (otherwise CVS checkouts from xml-xalan root have to
still look in all the attics...) -sc
> > -- At that point, I would think users could then easily do separate CVS
> > checkouts of 'xml-xalan/java', 'xml-xalan/test' and 'xml-xalan/c'
easily.
>
> Yes.
Yup. But I thought Sam was still complaining about that? Personally I like
having the 3 trees living in the same place. -sc
Oh, and I said -0 cause I didn't quite want to do this so soon, not to veto
it. Any sort of '0' vote is non-binding I thought - just an opportunity to
throw out inputs.
- Shane
