On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37:21PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: > > > Lu Baolu wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Edmondson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:13:15PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>>> For onnv, do you mean build 94 or 89? >>> Start with build 89. The onnv gate that Mark describes in his >>> instructions started out as based on build 89. It was later updated to >>> build 94, but it's still easier to start with 89. >>> >> >> Hi David, >> >> I changed the steps to build the vt-d supported xvm and onnv bits >> according to the discussion with you. Would you please help me to >> review it and tell whether it works? >> >> Grub and build xvm packages >> ======================== >> 1. Setting up all the environment parameters according to the Mark's >> instruction >> >> 2. Grab/setup the b101 xvm sources >> mkdir xvm-gate >> cd xvm-gate >> wget http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b89/xvm-src.tar.bz2 >> bzcat xvm-src.tar.bz2 | tar xf - >> >> 3. Clone the sunos.hg bits >> mv sunos.hg sunos.hg.89 >> hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/xen-gate/sunos-unstable sunos.hg > > You probably want to have the b89 sunos.hg bits > and > hg pull -uv <path-to-b101-xvm-source>/sunos.hg > > to pull in the 101 bits.. There will be a fair amount of merging > to get that to work.
Why would we want the 101 bits? The bits that he gets from the b89 based stuff should be self-consistent (which is all that matters right now). _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
