David Edmondson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:37:21PM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote: >> >> Lu Baolu wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Edmondson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:13:15PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >>>>> For onnv, do you mean build 94 or 89? >>>> Start with build 89. The onnv gate that Mark describes in his >>>> instructions started out as based on build 89. It was later updated to >>>> build 94, but it's still easier to start with 89. >>>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> I changed the steps to build the vt-d supported xvm and onnv bits >>> according to the discussion with you. Would you please help me to >>> review it and tell whether it works? >>> >>> Grub and build xvm packages >>> ======================== >>> 1. Setting up all the environment parameters according to the Mark's >>> instruction >>> >>> 2. Grab/setup the b101 xvm sources >>> mkdir xvm-gate >>> cd xvm-gate >>> wget http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b89/xvm-src.tar.bz2 >>> bzcat xvm-src.tar.bz2 | tar xf - >>> >>> 3. Clone the sunos.hg bits >>> mv sunos.hg sunos.hg.89 >>> hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/xen-gate/sunos-unstable sunos.hg >> You probably want to have the b89 sunos.hg bits >> and >> hg pull -uv <path-to-b101-xvm-source>/sunos.hg >> >> to pull in the 101 bits.. There will be a fair amount of merging >> to get that to work. > > Why would we want the 101 bits? The bits that he gets from the b89 > based stuff should be self-consistent (which is all that matters right > now).
I was just saying if he was trying to merge up to b101 (e.g. >>> 2. Grab/setup the b101 xvm sources), he would have to merge sunos.hg vs just using the 101 bits.. I guess I'm not clear on what the final goal is here? MRJ _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
