Lu Baolu wrote: >>> Why would we want the 101 bits? The bits that he gets from the b89 >>> based stuff should be self-consistent (which is all that matters right >>> now). >> I was just saying if he was trying to merge up to b101 >> (e.g. >>> 2. Grab/setup the b101 xvm sources), he would have >> to merge sunos.hg vs just using the 101 bits.. > > Hi Mark, > > That's a typo. I will work everything on b89, not willing to merge up to b101. > > The final goal here is to get xVM bits that support vt-d. > > So, if I use b89, following the instruction set here should be ok, right?
Yes. I just ran through them and it worked fine. I did run into one thing recently however. You need to build the xvm source on an older snv machine so they match the dom0 machine (I built mine on b93). I ran into problems when I build them on a b100a machine then tried to start xend on my unstable based dom0 (which is b94 based). (there was a htonll symbol problem with the xen libraries if you looked at the xend SMF log). MRJ _______________________________________________ xen-discuss mailing list [email protected]
