On 05/22/2012 11:22 PM, Mitchell Tasman wrote:
> Gilles,
>
> On 05/22/2012 04:07 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 05/22/2012 02:31 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote:
>>> Hi. I'm running an OMAP DM3725-based board with a 2.6.38.8 kernel, a
>>> mid-May 2012 git snapshot of xenomai-2.6, and a backport (really just
>>> application) of the patch that Gilles referenced in the "IRQ latency"
>>> thread last week:
>>>
>>> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=ipipe-gch.git;a=commit;h=81bfc05c4716b76e79f5e486baf4c52015a3b92c
>>
>> Please try the following patch instead:
>
> Thank you very much for your prompt and most helpful response.
>
> I have applied the patch that you supplied, and find a dramatic
> reduction in the maximum latency experienced in servicing edge-triggered
> GPIO interrupts. In testing so far today with the new patch, I have not
> encountered a single instance of the sort of extreme latency that
> prompted my query to the mailing list.
>
> Might you consider applying the new patch to I-Pipe for ARM 2.6.38.8,
> and publishing a new revision of that patch set? This could be of
> significant benefit to those members of the Xenomai community that are
> presently using a 2.6.38.8 kernel on ARM platforms.
>
> You might also consider addressing/replacing the original "ipipe/arm:
> defer chained interrupts handling" patch that was applied to I-Pipe for
> ARM 3.0.13, if the new patch is relevant to that kernel as well.
>
> Thanks again and Best Regards,
Yes, that's the plan. I am just waiting for Jean-Pascal's result to
confirm that everything is fine.
Regards.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
