On 05/25/2012 11:18 AM, Mitchell Tasman wrote:
> Gilles,
>
> On 05/22/2012 05:30 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 05/22/2012 11:22 PM, Mitchell Tasman wrote:
>>> I have applied the patch that you supplied, and find a dramatic
>>> reduction in the maximum latency experienced in servicing edge-triggered
>>> GPIO interrupts. In testing so far today with the new patch, I have not
>>> encountered a single instance of the sort of extreme latency that
>>> prompted my query to the mailing list.
>>>
>>> Might you consider applying the new patch to I-Pipe for ARM 2.6.38.8,
>>> and publishing a new revision of that patch set? This could be of
>>> significant benefit to those members of the Xenomai community that are
>>> presently using a 2.6.38.8 kernel on ARM platforms.
>>>
>>> You might also consider addressing/replacing the original "ipipe/arm:
>>> defer chained interrupts handling" patch that was applied to I-Pipe for
>>> ARM 3.0.13, if the new patch is relevant to that kernel as well.
>
>> Yes, that's the plan. I am just waiting for Jean-Pascal's result to
>> confirm that everything is fine.
>
> I thought I'd report that testing of
> adeos-ipipe-2.6.38.8-arm-1.18-06.patch plus the revised "IRQ Chaining"
> patch that you e-mailed continues to show a dramatic reduction in the
> maximum latency in servicing edge-triggered GPIO interrupts. Good news
> as well is that the load on the Linux domain (e.g. dohell vs. idle)
> appears to have much less effect on the latency in servicing such
> interrupts than was previously the case.
>
> I noticed that Jean-Pascal reported success as well, on 23 May.
>
> Thank you once again for your excellent support, and I very much look
> forward to the updated I-Pipe for ARM 2.6.38.8 patch set.
You are welcome. The patch should be done during the week-end.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
