Hi, (I think that I always put Hi or Bones (in catalan ..), I would like to put some comments to this thread:
<Roland> I really understand that you will take care of the debian directory of the upstream code. Probably I misunderstand something reading your posts ... I understand Gilles mail. I propose to have two branches in the upstream tree, one with the necessary stuff to create a kernel package for the debian stable tree (with their kernel) and another for the sid/testing. This stuff could be the same of the official ones. Maybe some submodules or another hyper-special characteristic of git could help. I don't understand your tone in your last mails. I think that it has been a misunderstanding problem. Please, _we_ can do it better. </Roland> <Gilles/Jan> Yes, I understand to Stéphane. However as I'm in several projects, a lot of mails and to much things and a few time to do it. I have had the same feeling, but, well, maybe I begin to be a bit old and .... I send to patch to UPSTREAM not to debian packagers. The script belongs to upstream. I had a bad feeling because no answer to the patch, no push. I had to insist because the stupid error. But, rereading the mail I think that I post it in a wrong and confusing way: mea culpa. </Gilles/Jan> Regards, Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
