On 03/13/2013 04:47 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Hi, (I think that I always put Hi or Bones (in catalan ..),
>
> I would like to put some comments to this thread:
>
> <Roland>
> I really understand that you will take care of the debian directory of the
> upstream code. Probably I misunderstand something reading your posts ... I
> understand Gilles mail.
>
> I propose to have two branches in the upstream tree, one with the necessary
> stuff to create a kernel package for the debian stable tree (with their
> kernel) and another for the sid/testing. This stuff could be the same of the
> official ones. Maybe some submodules or another hyper-special characteristic
> of git could help.
>
> I don't understand your tone in your last mails. I think that it has been a
> misunderstanding problem. Please, _we_ can do it better.
> </Roland>
>
> <Gilles/Jan>
> Yes, I understand to Stéphane. However as I'm in several projects, a lot of
> mails and to much things and a few time to do it. I have had the same
> feeling,
> but, well, maybe I begin to be a bit old and ....
>
> I send to patch to UPSTREAM not to debian packagers. The script belongs to
> upstream. I had a bad feeling because no answer to the patch, no push. I had
> to insist because the stupid error. But, rereading the mail I think that I
> post it in a wrong and confusing way: mea culpa.
> </Gilles/Jan>
Hi Leopold,
Yes, there was a misunderstanding, but ultimately, I am the one who did
the release, so, I could have tried to fix things. The truth is that I
simply forgot the issue you reported. So, mea culpa.
As for maintaing two debian directories, this is a bad idea, as long as
we can make one which works for all releases, this is simply less work.
So, let us keep it that way.
Regards.
--
Gilles.
_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
