On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With Xenomai Mercury (specifically the PSOS skin, but that doesn't
> matter for this question), the minimal stack size applied is
> PTHREAD_STACK_MIN * 4, even if the caller requested a smaller one.
>
> On MIPS, and some other architectures, PTHREAD_STACK_MIN is already 128K:
> (<glibc>/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/nptl/bits/local_lim.h)
>
> /* Minimum size for a thread. At least two pages with 64k pages. */
> #define PTHREAD_STACK_MIN 131072
>
> With Xenomai multiplying this with 4, every thread has half a megabyte
> of stack, which is way too much for systems with a large number of
> threads.
> It is possible to limit this in other ways, by setting 'ulimit -s 128'
> for example, but it is a dirty workaround in my opinion.
>
> What is the real minimum stack requirement for Xenomai? I cannot
> imagine that this is in the order of 512K.
>
> With PTHREAD_STACK_MIN varying so much on different platforms, what
> about code like:
>
> minimum_stacksize = MAX(XENOMAI_STACK_MIN, PTHREAD_STACK_MIN);
>
> if (stacksize < minimum_stacksize) {
>     stacksize = minimum_stacksize;
> }
>
> where XENOMAI_STACK_MIN is a value that is not calculated based on
> PTHREAD_STACK_MIN?
>
> With this approach, systems with 16K PTHREAD_STACK_MIN could still get
> 64K minimum stack in case the xenomai minimum stack size is 64K, while
> not negatively impacting systems that have 128K PTHREAD_STACK_MIN.
>
> (Note that for systems with 4K/8K pages, the PTHREAD_STACK_MIN of 128K
> (two 'pages' taken for 64K) is already very exaggerated)
>

Ping?

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to