Oh thats great! Thank you Mauro for your findings :) So finally I assume that there is some bug introduced with the latest patch. Never mind, until that is fixed (probably by next Monday), I will stick to the previous branch.
Thanks, Pintu On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Greg Gallagher <g...@embeddedgreg.com> wrote: > No problem, I won't be able to look into it till the weekend so any > help debugging is appreciated :) > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Mauro Salvini > <mauro.salv...@smigroup.net> wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 20:01 +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:15 PM, Greg Gallagher <g...@embeddedgreg.co >>> m> wrote: >>> > What version was this working in? I'm assuming you are working out >>> > of >>> > stable-3.0.x? If you reverted to an older git commit please post >>> > the >>> > commit. >>> > >>> >>> Sorry, I don't remember the previous working versions. >>> My current xeno-config is: >>> # xeno-config --info >>> Xenomai version: Xenomai/cobalt v3.0.6 -- #5956064 (2018-03-20 >>> 12:13:33 +0100) >>> Linux 4.9.51-x86-64-mine-xeno3-rtdm #1 SMP Mon Apr 9 21:35:39 JST >>> 2018 >>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> Kernel parameters: initrd=0:\initrd.img-4.9.51-x86-64-mine-xeno3-rtdm >>> root=/dev/disk/by-partlabel/system ro ip=off >>> I-pipe release #4 detected >>> Cobalt core 3.0.6 detected >>> Compiler: gcc version 5.4.0 xxx >>> Build args: >>> >>> With this it is working fine. >>> >>> However, when I remove everything (/usr/xenomai/) and re-install the >>> latest xenomai-3 (pulled today), it shows problem. >>> I did not revert any specific commit and tried. >>> May be I can check that later. >>> Note: as of now the problem is seen only when using >>> rt_task_wait_period(NULL). >>> When I use rt_task_sleep() then it works fine. >> >> Hi Greg and Pintu, >> >> commit 73de42cc87f8831694f119359472283f8c7a21e6 on stable branch >> contains patch that Philippe sent to me some days ago. >> He upstreamed it because I told him that patch was working, but in fact >> as I said in previous mail patch actually corrects one bug >> (rt_task_wait_period() that not return -EWOULDBLOCK if >> rt_task_set_periodic() was never called) but exploits another >> (rt_task_wait_period() return -EWOULDBLOCK also when >> rt_task_set_periodic() was called). >> >> It is my fault because when Philippe sent me the patch I tested only >> the previous non-working case and not the working, sorry for the mess. >> >> I'm trying to find where is the bug, but it's not simple because I >> don't know Xenomai internals. >> >> Thanks, regards >> >> Mauro >> _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
