> So, from my point of view it confirm my suspicious that the wrapper > mechanism is fragile. I really didn't understand why Xenomai core team > changed the native API for the POSIX. Although I saw the Jan Kiska > conference video explaining it, tell me primitive or dump, but I prefer to > have > a RT API that links against RT libraries and you can mix the POSIX functions > that you want in a clear way. > > OTOH I have to admit that convert a POSIX program to RT in an easy way is > amazing.
I normally disable wrappers and call explicitly the `__wrap_` equivalent when I want to use a Xenomai function , that is for instance `__wrap_pthread_create()` instead of `pthread_create()`. I also add my own forward declaration, e.g.: int __wrap_pthread_create(pthread_t *thread, const pthread_attr_t *attr, void *(*start_routine) (void *), void *arg); But maybe this is already provided in some of the Cobalt headers. _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
