On 14/09/18 09:45, Per Oberg wrote: [...]
> > Being able to use the same code, without patches or a lot of defines > including other files is a very clean way of debugging your software. I often > set up Simulations where I use my laptop running or our controller, possibly > connected to remote hardware to debug stuff. For these cases the POSIX skin > is very useful. > >>> As noted by Henning, please look at >>> https://github.com/nolange/cmake_xenomai, >>> could use some feedback =). >>> Particularly look at the patchset which also removes some headaches with >>> linking >>> precompiled object file for bootstrapping (but needs some upstream changes). > >> Norbert, I have followed your emails and your project. You did a good >> job, but I don't agree with your approach. My points are: > >> - You are trying to convert Xenomai a CMake project and this probably >> will not happen because Upstream is very happy with the autotools. I >> don't like to touch anything from upstream. Maybe some patch, but >> incorporated in Upstream. > > What do you mean with "convert Xenomai a CMake project"? I feel that I am > missing something... > Is it simply that the "xeno-config" way of doing things isn't cmak-onic > enough for a "real" CMake project or is there something deeper? well, I'm sorry I have been not clear. I'm saying the Norbert is trying to generate the config files that normally are generating by cmake. Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
