Re: Changing include to include/xercesc

[Arnaud Le Hors]

As far as I am concerned I don't have a pb with moving all the headers
into a specific subdirectory but I must say I really don't like the name
"xercesc". Why do we need a 'c' here? You're not concerned that it might
conflict with xercesj headers are you? ;-)
I suggest, if you change, to simply use either xerces or Xerces (my
preference).
-- 
Arnaud  Le Hors - IBM, XML Standards Strategy Group / W3C AC Rep.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]