RE: Changing include to include/xercesc

[Joseph_Kesselman]

>Anything that makes it difficult for me to build an app against the Xerces
>source tree or a binary release without code changes, doesn't sound like a
>good thing.

Would one way to allow folks to take their time moving to the new includes
be to set up files with the old names that just include the new ones...?

(I don't have a position on the proposal.)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]