Tinny, Peter,
maybe I misunderstand, but you guys are saying you wish to keep the
revision history intact, which implies NOT making the changes. Yet you are
voting '1' which is in support of going through with the proposal to change
the includes. Am I backwards?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Peter A. Volchek
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Hespelt, Steve (Exchange)
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... J. J. Merelo
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Adams, David
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Adams, David
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Gale, Gary (Factiva)
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Murray Cumming
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... bf0
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Peter A. Volchek
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Gale, Gary (Factiva)
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Arnold, Curt
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summar... Arnaud Le Hors
