> One comment: as a paranoid version-control freak, I'd strongly discourage
> renaming repository directories. It's bad policy, and can make it
difficult
> or impossible to reconstruct a prior release. Such reconstructions are one
> of the primary motivations for having version control in the first place.
> The clean thing to do is what Arnaud characterized as the "official" way:
> check out the tip from the existing locations, then check in to the new
> location. If it's deemed important to keep all the revision history
intact,
> I'd advocate cloning the repositories (which obviously has its own
> problems). Renaming the existing repository directories should be avoided
if
> at all possible.
>

Agree.
This is the only reason why I vote -1


Peter A. Volchek
Software Engineer
Metis International, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to