Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary and Vote

[Tinny Ng]

Murray Cumming wrote:

> My understanding is that if we rename src to xercesc then there will be
> no need to have an include directory.

No.  In the binary distribution, we don't ship the source.  Binary distribution only 
ships parts that are needed to "Run" the applications, i.e., the headers, the 
binaries, docs, and samples.  Thus renaming src
to xercesc is not enough for users who use the binary distribution which does not have 
the src folder at all.

> I do not believe that it will be necessary to do #3 if we do #1 and #2
> because the files in src will include the copied headers in
> include/xercesc/.

Yes we need.  For users who build from CVS tree or source distribution directly, the 
"include" folder does not exist at all.  So if we only do #1 and #2 without #3, then 
users who build from CVS tree directly
will for sure be broken.


Tinny


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]