On 3 Feb 2005, at 14:10, Jesse Pelton wrote:
Makes sense to me, except for one detail: I think names specified in standards should specifically be exempted from the proposed Mixed Case guideline. Such names should match the casing used in the standard.
To meet this guideline without such an exemption, names such as node
types, filter actions, error severity levels, and so on would have to be
transformed in some way. TEXT_NODE, for example, would become
Text_Node, TextNode, or something else.
I completely agree with this. I thought it was implied in the original statement - if not then this is a caveat of mine as well.
Cheers,
Gareth
-- Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing +44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
