> > This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf > file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary > language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand > that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very > unfair to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex. > > I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this unfair?
-- Best wishes, Vafa Khalighi
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
