because bidi has done absolutely noting in the creation of the pdf-file from this minimal text, but claims it:
\documentclass{article} \usepackage{bidi,xltxtra} \setmainfont{STFangsong} \begin{document} 中國好 \end{document} Rembrandt On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:33, Vafa Khalighi <v...@users.berlios.de> wrote: > > >> This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf >> file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary >> language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand >> that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very >> unfair to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex. >> >> > I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this > unfair? > > -- > Best wishes, > Vafa Khalighi > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > > -- 人有不為也而後可以有為
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex