Hi Nathan,

Others may have more to say, but I happen to have looked around yesterday due to the same problem and found that putting the line below in the preamble seems to solve the problem:

\let\aemph\veryundefinedcommand

Best wishes,

Adam

On Aug 18, 2012, at 11:02 PM, Nathan Sidoli wrote:

Is it possible to use polyglossia with arabxetex? It seems that both of them define the command \aemph. Since they both define it in the same way, it doesn't really matter, but it would be nice if there were no error message. Maybe each of them could be made to check if the command is already defined. Or is there some way to manually clear the definition before calling in the a later package.

Below is a minimal example.

Thanks,

Nathan

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}

\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setdefaultlanguage{french}

\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{Junicode}

\usepackage[novoc,fdf2noalif]{arabxetex}
\newfontfamily\arabicfont[Script=Arabic,Scale=1,WordSpace=2]{Amiri}

\newcommand{\A}{\textarabic}

\begin{document}

Nous adoptons {\it al-mu\b ht\=ariq\/} pour les raisons de sens et de graphie: {\it i\b htaraqa \/} = inventer un mensonge [$\,$Fl \"ugel a \A{m.hrrq}$\,$; mais une autre lecture serait \A{m_hrrf}$\, $, << charlatan~>>$\,$].

\end{document}




--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Adam McCollum, Ph.D.
Skype: adam.bar.yona



--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
 http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Reply via email to