On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Philip Taylor wrote: > I'm sorry, what has LaTeX to do with any of this ?
You don't want to hear about XeLaTeX, but you write: > (X)DVIPDFM(X). Since (X)DVIPDFM(X) is indeed an integral part of the XeTeX > tool chain, I think that documenting how to access its functionality (with The tool chain is XeLaTeX. LaTeX is just as much an integral part of that as XDVIPDFMX is. Users of this tool chain use all three together by typing a single command and don't care much which level executes which macro. It still makes sense to ask for documentation of each component alone, because people including yourself do also use the tools separately. But having made that request, "integrated tool chain" is not a sound basis to ask for documentation of a "XeTeX and XDVIPDFMX but not LaTeX" combination, which is neither the components alone nor the complete tool chain. It should be no surprise that documentation of pure XeTeX is documentation of pure XeTeX and does not include XDVIPDFMX features. -- Matthew Skala msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca People before principles. http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/ -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex