-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all,
Just to clarify this issue. Any commits to current Transifex is not used in the svn for Xfce. The future plans for Xfce is to do following: 1. Migration from svn to git. 2. Transifex is being considered to be future platform for translations. The current Transifex repo is not managed by Xfce! /Per Per Kongstad wrote: > Hi Gabor, > > As I understand it, the officiel place for svn for Xfce is > svn.xfce.org and I don't think that Transifex is pointing to this! So > to synch the 2 repos a script has to be employed. > > Using non officiel tools to maintain might not be adviseable. It will > create more issues than solutions. > > Gabor Kelemen wrote: > > Per Kongstad írta: > >> But what is the advantage for you to use Transifex over the Xfce? > >> > >> > > I see currently two advantages: > > - Po files and statistics are updated automagically on code change > > in repository - this is why the stats linked by Evangelos on the > > Transifex page are not the same as the ones on the xfce page. For > > example: > I agree to this limitation compared to twice a day update on the Xfce > stats. > No, Danish translation is nearly 100 % and compare this to Transifex > which shows far from 100%. > > > http://i18n.xfce.org/stats/show_po.php?lang=hu&branch=xfce/trunk&component=libexo&po > > > "POT-Creation-Date: 2009-04-08 13:54+0200\n" > > "PO-Revision-Date: 2009-06-09 03:10+0200\n" > > > and > > http://www.transifex.net/projects/libexo/trunk/view/po/hu.po > > "POT-Creation-Date: 2009-06-21 22:31+0000\n" > > "PO-Revision-Date: 2009-06-09 03:10+0200\n" > > > One of these contains two fuzzy strings, while the other one makes > > me think everything is fine. Which is which? > The officiel svn will be the one used for compiling packages. So I > think that will give you the answer. > > - Possibility of committing via a web interface. No more waiting for > > svn up commands to complete. No more unnecessary bandwidth-wasting. > > This can be very important to translators with narrow band access > > only - see the gnome-i18n@ archives since the git migration for > > evidence :). > > > +1: > Well you can check out only the po file directly from Xfce stats. > > - There is also some support for team workflow, so that one > > translator can lock the file he is working on, preventing others to > > make duplicate work. > > > Certainly, adopting Transifex would mean some extra work for the web > > site maintainers, but I think from the translator's point of view, > > it would worth it. > Well for now migration from svn to git is having priority and will be > done within nearest future. > > Transifex or Danmed Lies might be better, but for now I think that > using the official repo will create less confusion. > But it might be a good suggestion for the future. > > Regards > > Gabor Kelemen > > _______________________________________________ > > Xfce-i18n mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n > > I'm afraid that Transifex is not synched properly with svn for Xfce > and that some of your work will not be used or demand extra work on > your side. > So one again I would advice you to use official Xfce repo as being the > one used for any new releases. > > > > Best regards, > > Per Kongstad _______________________________________________ Xfce-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAko/RvgACgkQ2y9v5yQlyH0I1wCfbS9OjrIHpv2Tg/QdaqlGdOSd 7CoAn28WZn0dAnXTjIZlgoQd3Gn4X5N5 =qBEH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xfce-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/xfce-i18n
