No mind losing. That's a bad thing.
I'll poke through LiteS makefiles and see if anything is linking in wrong
order.
I would bet 2. is true, 1. is not, and that 3. is possible.
--
[ Joseph Mallett <jmallett@[newgold.net|xmrg.com|xMach.org]> ]
[ xMach Core Team xMach: Proactively Unbloated Microkernel BSD ]
[ Proud {Free,Net}BSD User; (Obj)C(++) Programmer ] [ http://xMach.org ]
Support my computer addiction buy something from http://www.jmallett.org
On Sun, 6 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have to admit that I have the harshest problems debugging this thing.
> According to documentation, cthreads are kinda initialized automatically.
> cthread_init() is supposed to be called in _start just as long as its
> linked via -lthread before -lmach. Debug messages in cthread_init are not
> displayed, so I can see three different pssibilities:
> 1. the docs lie and we have to call some sort of initialization.
> 2. the printf statements cannot write to the console and get ignored
> somehow.
> 3. we forgot to put -lthread in a place that matters...
>
> I am loosing my mind.
>
> JAn
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Joseph Mallett wrote:
>
> > The Mach stuff is from Utah, Lites is from Utah's version, as well as
> > NTT's RTMach Lites. User is from Utah's User22.
> >
> > The _layout_ is drastically different, because I wanted to make building
> > slightly saner.
> >
> > --
> > [ Joseph Mallett <jmallett@[newgold.net|xmrg.com|xMach.org]> ]
> > [ xMach Core Team xMach: Proactively Unbloated Microkernel BSD ]
> > [ Proud {Free,Net}BSD User; (Obj)C(++) Programmer ] [ http://xMach.org ]
> >
> > Support my computer addiction buy something from http://www.jmallett.org
> >
> > On Sun, 6 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I am wondering where the current code base is coming from. I am just
> > > looking at the code available from UTAH, and the whole thing looks very
> > > different. So what parts come from where, please?
> > >
> > > JAn
> > >
> >
>
