On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Sean Young wrote: > This includes the zlib-1.1.3 with the "double free" bug: > > http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-07.html > > I'm not sure it's a security issue for xmame; but in any case, hasn't the > time arrived to remove zlib from the tree? Wasn't it only older versions > of Red Hat that had problems with zlib? > > Apologies if this has already been discussed on the list.
I've had problems with xmame and zlib with NetBSD 1.4.x. 1.5.0 and later doesn't have any problem. -- David Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
