On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Sean Young wrote:

> This includes the zlib-1.1.3 with the "double free" bug:
>
>       http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-07.html
>
> I'm not sure it's a security issue for xmame; but in any case, hasn't the
> time arrived to remove zlib from the tree? Wasn't it only older versions
> of Red Hat that had problems with zlib?

I believe all versions of X's libz.a had a problem.

brian
---
All progress is the work of fanatics
All fanatics are the work of progress
  6:00am  up 5 days, 13:21,  6 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00


_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Reply via email to