On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:42:04AM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > This includes the zlib-1.1.3 with the "double free" bug: > > http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-07.html > > I'm not sure it's a security issue for xmame; but in any case, hasn't the > time arrived to remove zlib from the tree? Wasn't it only older versions > of Red Hat that had problems with zlib?
I don't recall the original reason for including zlib. I think I'll just leave it in but make sure the double free bugfix gets applied. Thanks for pointing this out. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
