>On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:12:20PM -0600, starz wrote:
>> Since the the release of XFree 4.2 mode changing seems automatic with
>> correct dga settings and compatible monitor and graphics card, so you
>> shouldn't need to scale...but then again that's just X
>
>Yeah, but the last part of that question is can you get the same behavior
>using just the frambuffer?  If so do you specify modelines for the various
>resolutions and where?  If it's not possible then I'll go with X even if
>there was a performance benefit to just using the framebuffer.  But I'm
>curious as to what other people might have done or just the pure facts that
>X with DGA will always whip the pants off using only the framebuffer or
vice
>versa.  Take Care
>
>Robert
>

You know, personally I think the framebuffer is a better way to go, and
I've talked to the main xmame maintainer about makeing it possible to have
a video option like the "mplayer -vo vesa" option although the mplayer guys
were not willing share the code due to mame's current license. It would be
nice to implement something like this, then people who choose not to use X
can have a "good" alternative with xmame. I'm sure someone could produce
something like this but I'm not the person, due to lack of programming
skills. Now the "fbdev" thing I've never able to have gotten to work, also
due to lack of knowledge about it. But mplayer & gens works fine in
framebuffer mode, and I run a 1600x1200 virtual console (most of the time).

End rant
starz

_____________________________________________
Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
http://www.MyOwnEmail.com


_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame

Reply via email to