On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 10:40:06AM -0400, Simon Roby wrote: > > Yep, that's how it does. However, one wonders if this is really a > legitimate way to go around MAME's license, but IANAL. > > BTW, Lawrence, have you thought about doing the same? Sure, xmame would > be more troublesome to install (download the mame code, patch it, THEN > compile xmame) but it would allow some more freedom in licensing.
I have thought about it. One thing that stands in the way is the fix-comments script, which mangles one file (vendetta.c, I think), as well as d2u, which now mangles one of the CPU cores. I think I'll first try to use the MESS CVS repository, though that still forces some people to use fix-comments if their compiler doesn't support C++/C99 comments. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
