The documentation for xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode() states that it ensures `the removed branch [is] autark wrt ns-references.'
The only hits for `autark' in Google are in this code, so normally I'd suspect that a search-and-replace run has transformed something else into autarky: but in this case it was added at the same time as the function, in r3123 by Kasimier Buchcik. Does anyone have a clue what `autark' actually means? (In context, I'd expect `up to date' or `not obsolete' or perhaps `consistent'?) -- `... in the sense that dragons logically follow evolution so they would be able to wield metal.' --- Kenneth Eng's colourless green ideas sleep furiously _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
