Nix wrote: > The documentation for xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode() states that it ensures `the > removed branch [is] autark wrt ns-references.' > > The only hits for `autark' in Google are in this code, so normally I'd > suspect that a search-and-replace run has transformed something else > into autarky: but in this case it was added at the same time as the > function, in r3123 by Kasimier Buchcik. > > Does anyone have a clue what `autark' actually means? (In context, I'd > expect `up to date' or `not obsolete' or perhaps `consistent'?)
See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/autarky - in this context, he basically means "self-sufficient", i.e. namespaces are included on the node itself. _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
