On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:09:05PM -0700, William M. Brack wrote: > Nix wrote: > > The documentation for xmlDOMWrapRemoveNode() states that it ensures `the > > removed branch [is] autark wrt ns-references.' > > > > The only hits for `autark' in Google are in this code, so normally I'd > > suspect that a search-and-replace run has transformed something else > > into autarky: but in this case it was added at the same time as the > > function, in r3123 by Kasimier Buchcik. > > > > Does anyone have a clue what `autark' actually means? (In context, I'd > > expect `up to date' or `not obsolete' or perhaps `consistent'?) > > See http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/autarky - in this context, he > basically means "self-sufficient", i.e. namespaces are included on the > node itself.
Heh, Kasimier wins the prize for the most cryptic while correct comment. I guess it's worth a (virtual) beer, Daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
