On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Alan Coopersmith
<alan.coopersm...@sun.com> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> Another thing to think about is that libX11 is currently in 1.3 RC
>> phase, so it's reasonable to enforce newer proto versions in addition
>> to the version of xproto needed for generic events. We can branch from
>> before the generic events patches (75fe48e7a) and cherry pick patches
>> for a 1.2.x for people on more stable systems. In fact, there aleady
>> is libX11-1.2-branch.
>
> 1.3 is already out & stable.  I don't think we've had a reason yet to
> split off a libX11-1.3-branch, since there's no changes proposed that
> would warrant a 1.4 bump.

Oh, man, I was in an extremely stale checkout. Pushing newer proto
versions doesn't seem like a nice thing to do in the middle of a
stable branch.

--
Dan
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
xorg-devel@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to