On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:37:50 +0000, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:

> I'd be happiest with RandR 1.4 backed out until 1.11.  I just don't
> think it's had quite enough (non-rushed) review, exposure or testing,
> and it's not the best of precedents to be setting for future releases.
> Sorry.

As release manager, this seems like the right solution. However, it's a
larger change than adding the new fix-ups, which doesn't exactly make me
less nervous.

In either case, I need to see some testing of the server before I feel
comfortable releasing it.

Can I get people to run the backout-randr branch today so we can get
some idea of whether we had accidental dependencies on the randr 1.4
code in drivers or other parts of the server?

The branch without RandR 1.4:

        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver backout-randr

If you want to try out the RandR 1.4 bits, you can use:

        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver randr-fixes

To test the RandR 1.4 bits, you'll need:

        git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/randrproto master

        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/libXrandr randr-1.4

        git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xrandr randr-1.4

Please report success or failure from any testing.

--
keith.pack...@intel.com

Attachment: pgpwhlhI5DxEB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to