On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:37:50 +0000, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > >> I'd be happiest with RandR 1.4 backed out until 1.11. I just don't >> think it's had quite enough (non-rushed) review, exposure or testing, >> and it's not the best of precedents to be setting for future releases. >> Sorry. > > As release manager, this seems like the right solution. However, it's a > larger change than adding the new fix-ups, which doesn't exactly make me > less nervous. > > In either case, I need to see some testing of the server before I feel > comfortable releasing it. > > Can I get people to run the backout-randr branch today so we can get > some idea of whether we had accidental dependencies on the randr 1.4 > code in drivers or other parts of the server?
We have this commit in the most recent radeon release: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=3dc28c86eb57cac819e4ed650acfe1f7df6ef565 Which will conflict with the backout. Alex > > The branch without RandR 1.4: > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver backout-randr > > If you want to try out the RandR 1.4 bits, you can use: > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xserver randr-fixes > > To test the RandR 1.4 bits, you'll need: > > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/randrproto master > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/libXrandr randr-1.4 > > git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/xrandr randr-1.4 > > Please report success or failure from any testing. > > -- > keith.pack...@intel.com > > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel > _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel