On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 19:50 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > So there is quite a bit of unfortunate duplication in bugzilla. We have > components in for libX11 in both the xlibs product and the xorg product. Xft > has its own product as well as a component in the xorg product. > > I'd like to get this all straightened out. I believe the goal was to have > everything within the xorg product, so that is what I'm doing as I go through > our bugs. Is that still the case? If so, is there a way that we can close > these products to eliminate confusion: > xapps > XCursor > Xft > xlibs > Xrender > xserver > > If instead we want to keep apps and libs in xapps and xlibs, we should > probably close out the duplicate xorg components (or other products). > > Should we move XCB from its own product into an xorg component for > consistency?
Yes, it is important to implement the proper X.Org project architecture. I'll take this opportunity to advocate that the xcb source repositories should be relocated under /xorg if feasible. These are the only externally recognizable hints that xcb is part of x.org project. That would be helpful to direct comments/bug reports to the correct location. > > > > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
