On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 08:18:31 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote: > On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 19:50 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > > > So there is quite a bit of unfortunate duplication in bugzilla. We have > > components in for libX11 in both the xlibs product and the xorg product. > > Xft has its own product as well as a component in the xorg product. > > > > I'd like to get this all straightened out. I believe the goal was to have > > everything within the xorg product, so that is what I'm doing as I go > > through our bugs. Is that still the case? If so, is there a way that we > > can close these products to eliminate confusion: > > xapps > > XCursor > > Xft > > xlibs > > Xrender > > xserver > > > > If instead we want to keep apps and libs in xapps and xlibs, we should > > probably close out the duplicate xorg components (or other products). > > > > Should we move XCB from its own product into an xorg component for > > consistency? > > Yes, it is important to implement the proper X.Org project architecture. > > I'll take this opportunity to advocate that the xcb source repositories > should be relocated under /xorg if feasible. These are the only > externally recognizable hints that xcb is part of x.org project. That > would be helpful to direct comments/bug reports to the correct location. > I'm not sure what the perceived benefit is, can you explain?
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
