Around 16 o'clock on Nov 6, Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= wrote: > Okay, is there anything wrong with turning the struct for the ioctl into > a union of a request and a reply struct? :)
That is the usual way, I believe... Or, you can just build a larger struct containing both pieces. > Yes. The blocking ioctl also returns a timestamp, is that important for > the signal? Might be nice; there's plenty of space. Is it expensive to compute? > Oh, and BTW, is it okay for the ioctl to trigger a single signal, or > would it have to generate signals indefinitely? Might want a mode that chose between these two options, but if I had to pick one, I'd ask for a single signal. That's what SYNC wants. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
