* Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  > OK, thanks for the explanations.

That's cool.  I should have explained it when I first submitted the
patch. 

  > Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  >> Therefore, I strongly suggest that you revert your "fix" and replay my
  >> patch-4.

  > Almost what I've done. I just renamed xtlahack.el to xtla-build.el.

And it almost works too. :-P  Here's the fix...

--- orig/lisp/Makefile.in
+++ mod/lisp/Makefile.in
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
         contrib/ewoc.el
 XSRCS = auto-autoloads.el custom-load.el xtla-version.el
 PACKAGEDIR = @lispdir@
-EXTRA_OPTS = -l xtla-build
+EXTRA_OPTS = -l ../@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 endif
 
 AUTOLOAD_PACKAGE_NAME = (setq autoload-package-name \"xtla\")


  > See [EMAIL PROTECTED] for what
  > I've done, and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > for the integration in the mainline.

Looks great, apart from that tiny glitch above.  And it looks like I
missed one undefined function warning, but the fix is simple... Just
put the definition of `clone-process' in xtla-xemacs.el _before_
`clone-buffer'.  The warning is generated because `clone-buffer' calls
`clone-process' and the latter is defined after the former.

Matthieu, will you take care of both of those things or do you want me
to?

  > Sorry for loosing some of your time, but the current lisp/Makefile.in
  > seems to me already overcomplicated for what it does, so I don't like
  > adding more stuff to the build system if I don't really understand
  > what it does and why it's there.

I totally understand, and there is no need to apologise.

  >> > 'Hope everybody's happy now ;-)

  > Once more!

  >> Nearly. :-)  

:-)

  >> I'm looking forward to getting the build in shape so I can start
  >> fixing real problems in the code.  And when xtla is running well
  >> enough on XEmacs I want to talk to you about having it included
  >> as an "official" XEmacs package. :-)

  > Great! The current XEmacs maintainer for Xtla (Robert Widhopf-Fenk)
  > is not very active on Xtla currently, it's great to have someone
  > else working on this.

Well, you GNU/Emacs people can't have all the fun. :-)


-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|                   Te audire no possum.                   |
|             Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.             |
|----------------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>---|

Attachment: pgpoQbE5qlm0M.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to