On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 00:31:39, Steve Youngs wrote: [...] > Well, you GNU/Emacs people can't have all the fun. :-)
When it comes to fun ... I did not knew that a warning about an undefined function can be avoided by defaliasing it to ignore. Cool! There are two things I wonder about: - If those functions/packages become available in XEmacs, do we then have to recompile the ELs in order to guarantee that everything is working? - Is it possible to avoid a undefined-function warning also locally, i.e. a the position of a call. Since by getting no warning anymore I also might miss new occurrences of the function which are not guarded against XEmacs so far. Robert
