Haha, noticed lol... I have been using Turbocad for nearly two decades and rely heavily on it for my electric schematics. Sadly, the software authors/company never provided any drivers for linux. And after a fairly deep search for alternatives, the odd couple of them available are exceedingly inadequate and unstable in behaviour for my cad needs.
Not a Linux shortcoming, see... just one of the many cases where authors/developers don't bother considering linux usage for it when developing it. So the question obviously is: why don't software developers in some areas even bother with linux when developing their applications? I leave it at that... ;) On 12 Jul 2017 19:06, "Ralf Mardorf" <silver.bul...@zoho.com> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:51:46 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:33:09 +0100, Joao Monteiro wrote: > >>- CAD wise, linux is still useless > > > >I can't speak about the software, but at least some people are > >satisfied with Linux for CAT. > ^^^ *lol* > Not a joke, just a typo. > > > The real-time patches seem to work. Much > >likely it's the same as for pro-audio, which is my domain. How much > >MIDI jitter I get depends less on a patched real-time kernel, but > >much more on the hardware > > > -- > xubuntu-users mailing list > xubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users >
-- xubuntu-users mailing list xubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users
