On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:36:19PM +0200, Josef Reidinger wrote: > Now first note. I do not see in decisions why C++ is used as language > for this library. I think it would be nice to document it why it is > needed as currently from document I see that planned users are machinery > ( which use ruby ), Yast (ruby) and kiwi (perl). Is there any > performance reasons, availability of bindings, libraries or any other > reason to use it?
Sure, I'll write something to the documentation. > As libstorage basically use CLI of other programs, so question > is why not use more high level language. Why should C++11 not be a "very" (not in the term of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high-level_programming_language) high level language? I fear an endless discussion coming. Regards, Arvin -- Arvin Schnell, <[email protected]> Senior Software Engineer, Research & Development SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstraße 5 90409 Nürnberg Germany -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
