On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:52:40 +0200 Arvin Schnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 04:36:19PM +0200, Josef Reidinger wrote: > > > Now first note. I do not see in decisions why C++ is used as > > language for this library. I think it would be nice to document it > > why it is needed as currently from document I see that planned > > users are machinery ( which use ruby ), Yast (ruby) and kiwi > > (perl). Is there any performance reasons, availability of bindings, > > libraries or any other reason to use it? > > Sure, I'll write something to the documentation. > > > As libstorage basically use CLI of other programs, so question > > is why not use more high level language. > > Why should C++11 not be a "very" (not in the term of > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high-level_programming_language) > high level language? I fear an endless discussion coming. I do not want to start flame and I am fine with such explanation, I just said it should be documented ( and it will as you write above ). During my presentations I often get such question for yast. Why it is ruby and not python, js, go, whatever ( funny that noone mention C++ or perl, probably not enough sexy :). Josef > > Regards, > Arvin > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
